PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWI vs. MCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWI vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWI achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than MCHI's -10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EWI has outperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 13.44%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.


EWI

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
7.95%
6M
12.15%
1Y
25.19%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
13.44%

MCHI

1D
-0.94%
1M
-7.53%
YTD
-10.22%
6M
-12.26%
1Y
0.38%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
-6.07%
10Y*
4.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWI vs. MCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
7.95%55.72%10.23%30.63%-14.16%14.38%1.69%26.98%-17.18%28.70%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-10.22%31.04%17.73%-11.94%-23.01%-21.74%27.78%23.72%-19.79%54.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EWI and MCHI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.51

The correlation between EWI and MCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWI vs. MCHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWI
MCHI

Financial Services

47.8%
19.1%

Utilities

17.9%
1.7%

Industrials

11.1%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
26.4%

Energy

7.4%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.5%
18.8%

Healthcare

1.4%
5.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Technology

-

9.6%

Financial Services

EWI
47.8%
MCHI
19.1%

Utilities

EWI
17.9%
MCHI
1.7%

Industrials

EWI
11.1%
MCHI
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EWI
9.8%
MCHI
26.4%

Energy

EWI
7.4%
MCHI
3.7%

Communication Services

EWI
2.5%
MCHI
18.8%

Healthcare

EWI
1.4%
MCHI
5.4%

Basic Materials

EWI
1.1%
MCHI
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

EWI
1.0%
MCHI
3.2%

Real Estate

EWI

-

MCHI
1.5%

Technology

EWI

-

MCHI
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWI vs. MCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWI
EWI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWI Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MCHI
MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWI vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWIMCHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.02

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

0.02

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

0.04

+7.50

EWI vs. MCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the MCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWI and MCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWIMCHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.02

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

-0.20

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.16

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.08

+0.14

Drawdowns

EWI vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWI drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than MCHI's maximum drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWI and MCHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWIMCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-62.95%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-18.51%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-25.85%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-56.98%

+21.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

-62.95%

+19.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-38.78%

+37.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.93%

-24.53%

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

8.52%

-5.17%

Volatility

EWI vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) is 5.33%, while iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that EWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWIMCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

7.03%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

14.70%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.19%

20.26%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.12%

30.73%

-9.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

27.41%

-4.15%

EWI vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWI vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison

EWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than MCHI's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
2.60%2.80%4.07%3.40%4.57%2.63%1.66%3.80%4.71%2.19%3.64%2.31%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.36%2.12%2.31%2.66%1.78%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWI and MCHI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCHI has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to EWI (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWI dropped -70.38% vs MCHI's -62.95%.

On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 13.44% vs 4.43% for MCHI. On fees, EWI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWI has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCHI.

EWI has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.36% for MCHI.

EWI is categorized as Europe Equities, while MCHI is China Equities. EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index, while MCHI tracks MSCI China Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWI and 0.59% for MCHI.

EWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWI and MCHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer