EWI vs. CDC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWI (iShares MSCI Italy ETF) and CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWI is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Italy Index, while CDC is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWI returned 13.03%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for CDC. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWI charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for CDC.

Performance

EWI vs. CDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWI achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EWI has outperformed CDC with an annualized return of 13.03%, while CDC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.

EWI

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: 3.96%
• YTD: 7.69%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: 26.01%
• 3Y*: 28.33%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: 13.03%

CDC

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 10.29%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 11.97%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWI vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWI iShares MSCI Italy ETF	7.69%	55.72%	10.23%	30.63%	-14.16%	14.38%	1.69%	26.98%	-17.18%	28.70%
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	10.57%	8.96%	14.48%	-4.99%	-7.86%	33.05%	12.88%	19.64%	-5.97%	15.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EWI and CDC is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014	0.57

The correlation between EWI and CDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWI vs. CDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWI	CDC
Financial Services	47.5%	23.4%
Utilities	18.3%	24.3%
Industrials	12.5%	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	6.6%
Energy	7.5%	9.5%
Communication Services	2.2%	4.4%
Healthcare	1.4%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	15.9%
Basic Materials	0.6%	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Technology	-	6.9%

Return for Risk

EWI vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWI

EWI Risk / Return Rank: 41
EWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EWI Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EWI Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CDC

CDC Risk / Return Rank: 58
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWI vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWI	CDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.87	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.78	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	3.22	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.80	11.37	-3.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWI vs. CDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the CDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWI and CDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWI	CDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	1.87	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.41	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.76	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.74	-0.52

Drawdowns

EWI vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWI drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWI and CDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWI	CDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.38%	-21.37%	-49.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.48%	-5.67%	-6.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.80%	-12.70%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.25%	-21.37%	-13.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.00%	-21.37%	-21.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-2.20%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.94%	-5.09%	-23.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	1.60%	+1.74%

Volatility

EWI vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) at 2.66%. This indicates that EWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWI	CDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	2.66%	+3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.68%	6.84%	+7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.06%	9.77%	+8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.10%	12.54%	+8.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.26%	13.21%	+10.05%

EWI vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWI vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison

EWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than CDC's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	3.18%	3.36%	3.32%	4.24%	3.48%	2.65%	2.48%	3.04%	3.37%	2.81%	2.99%	3.17%
EWI iShares MSCI Italy ETF	2.60%	2.80%	4.07%	3.40%	4.57%	2.63%	1.66%	3.80%	4.71%	2.19%	3.64%	2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWI and CDC in my portfolio?

EWI and CDC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWI or CDC?

EWI has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to CDC (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWI dropped -70.38% vs CDC's -21.37%.

Which ETF is better, EWI or CDC?

On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 13.03% vs 10.03% for CDC. On fees, CDC is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, CDC has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWI or CDC?

Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWI or CDC?

CDC is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWI or CDC?

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.60% for EWI.

What is the main difference between EWI and CDC?

EWI is categorized as Europe Equities, while CDC is Large Cap Value Equities. EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index, while CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWI and 0.37% for CDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.