EWH vs. CHIQ
EWH (iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF) and CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWH is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Hong Kong Index, while CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWH returned 4.69%/yr vs 6.04%/yr for CHIQ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWH charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CHIQ.
Performance
EWH vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWH achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than CHIQ's -23.02% return. Over the past 10 years, EWH has underperformed CHIQ with an annualized return of 4.69%, while CHIQ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.04% annualized return.
EWH
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- -1.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
CHIQ
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -11.75%
- YTD
- -23.02%
- 6M
- -23.86%
- 1Y
- -20.71%
- 3Y*
- -0.66%
- 5Y*
- -12.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.04%
EWH vs. CHIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 1.00% | 34.50% | 0.00% | -13.87% | -6.81% | -3.49% | 4.17% | 10.74% | -8.76% | 36.46% |
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -23.02% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWH and CHIQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2009 | 0.72 |
The correlation between EWH and CHIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWH vs. CHIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWH
CHIQ
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
EWH
CHIQ
-
Industrials
EWH
CHIQ
Real Estate
EWH
CHIQ
Utilities
EWH
CHIQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWH
CHIQ
Consumer Defensive
EWH
CHIQ
Communication Services
EWH
CHIQ
-
Basic Materials
EWH
-
CHIQ
-
Energy
EWH
-
CHIQ
-
Healthcare
EWH
-
CHIQ
-
Technology
EWH
-
CHIQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWH vs. CHIQ — Risk / Return Rank
EWH
CHIQ
EWH vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWH | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.86 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.63 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | -1.52 | +5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWH vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWH drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, roughly equal to the maximum CHIQ drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWH and CHIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWH | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -67.04% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.91% | -32.87% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -32.87% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.28% | -59.95% | +18.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -67.04% | +24.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -59.61% | +47.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.46% | -30.68% | +11.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 13.68% | -9.69% |
Volatility
EWH vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) is 5.32%, while Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that EWH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWH | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 6.60% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 16.22% | -3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 22.46% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 37.74% | -17.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 32.43% | -12.89% |
EWH vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWH has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWH vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison
EWH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than CHIQ's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.92% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 4.90% | 5.20% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 2.91% | 2.78% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 4.35% | 3.08% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWH and CHIQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHIQ has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to EWH (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWH dropped -66.44% vs CHIQ's -67.04%.
On 10-year performance, CHIQ leads with 6.04% vs 4.69% for EWH. On fees, EWH is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWH has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CHIQ has performed better with a 6.04% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWH is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.
EWH has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 1.92% for CHIQ.
EWH is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CHIQ is China Equities. EWH tracks MSCI Hong Kong Index, while CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWH and 0.65% for CHIQ.
EWH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWH and CHIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer