PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWH vs. CHIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWH vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWH achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly higher than CHIQ's -21.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EWH has underperformed CHIQ with an annualized return of 4.79%, while CHIQ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.22% annualized return.


EWH

1D
0.23%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
2.00%
6M
0.16%
1Y
17.74%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
-0.71%
10Y*
4.79%

CHIQ

1D
-1.30%
1M
-10.24%
YTD
-21.70%
6M
-23.30%
1Y
-17.82%
3Y*
-0.10%
5Y*
-12.20%
10Y*
6.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWH vs. CHIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
2.00%34.50%0.00%-13.87%-6.81%-3.49%4.17%10.74%-8.76%36.46%
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
-21.70%13.69%10.74%-10.70%-22.01%-27.07%92.61%44.19%-28.65%67.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EWH and CHIQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2009

0.72

The correlation between EWH and CHIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWH vs. CHIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWH
CHIQ

Financial Services

43.9%

-

Industrials

18.3%
0.2%

Real Estate

18.0%
0.3%

Utilities

11.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
95.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.2%

Communication Services

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

0.3%

Financial Services

EWH
43.9%
CHIQ

-

Industrials

EWH
18.3%
CHIQ
0.2%

Real Estate

EWH
18.0%
CHIQ
0.3%

Utilities

EWH
11.6%
CHIQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWH
3.9%
CHIQ
95.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWH
2.6%
CHIQ
3.2%

Communication Services

EWH
1.7%
CHIQ

-

Basic Materials

EWH

-

CHIQ

-

Energy

EWH

-

CHIQ

-

Healthcare

EWH

-

CHIQ

-

Technology

EWH

-

CHIQ
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWH vs. CHIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWH
EWH Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EWH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EWH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CHIQ
CHIQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CHIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWH vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWHCHIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.88

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

-0.56

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

-1.32

+5.87

EWH vs. CHIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWH Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the CHIQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWH and CHIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWH vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWH drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, roughly equal to the maximum CHIQ drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWH and CHIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWHCHIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.44%

-67.04%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.91%

-31.72%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-31.72%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.28%

-59.95%

+18.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.71%

-67.04%

+24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.71%

-58.92%

+47.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.47%

-30.68%

+11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

13.52%

-9.61%

Volatility

EWH vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) is 5.30%, while Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that EWH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWHCHIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

6.51%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

16.16%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

22.44%

-5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.11%

37.74%

-17.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

32.46%

-12.87%

EWH vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWH has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIQ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWH vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison

EWH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than CHIQ's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.89%1.48%2.65%2.26%0.38%0.00%0.11%1.05%2.71%0.62%1.51%4.86%
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
4.86%5.20%4.17%4.28%2.91%2.78%2.56%2.71%2.93%4.35%3.08%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWH and CHIQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHIQ has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to EWH (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWH dropped -66.44% vs CHIQ's -67.04%.

On 10-year performance, CHIQ leads with 6.22% vs 4.79% for EWH. On fees, EWH is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWH has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CHIQ has performed better with a 6.22% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWH is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.

EWH has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 1.89% for CHIQ.

EWH is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CHIQ is China Equities. EWH tracks MSCI Hong Kong Index, while CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWH and 0.65% for CHIQ.

EWH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWH and CHIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer