EVX vs. NLR
EVX (VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVX is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EVX returned 12.03%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for NLR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
EVX vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVX achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EVX has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 12.03%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.
EVX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
NLR
- 1D
- -4.59%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 36.84%
- 3Y*
- 35.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
EVX vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 2.99% | 11.72% | 12.99% | 12.97% | -10.58% | 27.47% | 13.28% | 28.41% | -3.82% | 16.05% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 6.14% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVX and NLR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2007 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EVX and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EVX vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EVX
NLR
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
Industrials
EVX
NLR
Basic Materials
EVX
NLR
-
Consumer Defensive
EVX
NLR
-
Utilities
EVX
NLR
Communication Services
EVX
-
NLR
-
Consumer Cyclical
EVX
-
NLR
-
Financial Services
EVX
-
NLR
-
Healthcare
EVX
-
NLR
-
Real Estate
EVX
-
NLR
-
Technology
EVX
-
NLR
Energy
EVX
NLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVX vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
EVX
NLR
EVX vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVX | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.17 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 1.43 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.15 | 2.93 | -1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVX | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.88 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.75 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.18 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
EVX vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVX drawdown since its inception was -55.91%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVX and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVX | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.91% | -65.05% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -25.80% | +14.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.33% | -30.48% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.45% | -30.48% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | -34.35% | -6.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -19.80% | +12.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -35.72% | +26.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | 12.61% | -8.05% |
Volatility
EVX vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) is 3.52%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that EVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVX | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 13.18% | -9.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 32.83% | -22.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 42.32% | -28.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 29.24% | -11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 24.02% | -3.77% |
EVX vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVX vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
EVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than NLR's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.46% | 0.95% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.16% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.40% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVX and NLR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to EVX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVX dropped -55.91% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 13.66% vs 12.03% for EVX. On fees, EVX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 13.66% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.18% for EVX.
EVX is categorized as Industrials Equities, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. EVX tracks NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EVX and 0.56% for NLR.
NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVX and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer