PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVX vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVX achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -13.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EVX has outperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 11.96%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.


EVX

1D
1.11%
1M
-0.84%
6M
0.37%
YTD
7.03%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
9.30%

GDXJ

1D
3.44%
1M
-4.12%
6M
-20.48%
YTD
-13.28%
1Y
55.23%
3Y*
43.15%
5Y*
18.66%
10Y*
8.85%
ALL TIME*
1.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$224.72K$207.86K$298.95K
$470.71M$441.62M$622.38M

EVX vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVX
VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF
7.03%11.72%12.99%12.97%-10.58%27.47%13.28%28.41%-3.82%16.05%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-13.28%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%-11.02%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EVX and GDXJ is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009

0.21

The correlation between EVX and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EVX vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVX
GDXJ

Industrials

86.5%

-

Basic Materials

8.2%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

-0.0%

-

Industrials

EVX
86.5%
GDXJ

-

Basic Materials

EVX
8.2%
GDXJ
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

EVX
3.9%
GDXJ

-

Utilities

EVX
1.4%
GDXJ

-

Communication Services

EVX

-

GDXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

EVX

-

GDXJ

-

Financial Services

EVX

-

GDXJ
0.1%

Healthcare

EVX

-

GDXJ

-

Real Estate

EVX

-

GDXJ

-

Technology

EVX

-

GDXJ

-

Energy

EVX
-0.0%
GDXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVX vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVX
EVX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVXGDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.20

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.34

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.54

2.83

-1.29

EVX vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVX and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVX drawdown since its inception was -55.91%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVX and GDXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVXGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.91%

-88.66%

+32.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-41.32%

+30.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-41.32%

+23.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

-48.79%

+27.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

-57.77%

+16.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-36.83%

+33.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-60.25%

+51.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

19.56%

-14.65%

Volatility

EVX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) is 3.57%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 14.46%. This indicates that EVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVXGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

14.46%

-10.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

42.31%

-32.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

54.05%

-40.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

42.11%

-24.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

44.20%

-23.96%

EVX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

EVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than GDXJ's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVX
VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF
0.17%0.19%0.46%0.95%0.41%0.24%0.32%0.38%0.38%0.89%0.70%1.16%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.69%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVX and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (14.46%) compared to EVX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVX dropped -55.91% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

On 10-year performance, EVX leads with 11.96% vs 8.85% for GDXJ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, EVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EVX has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EVX.

GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.17% for EVX.

EVX is categorized as Industrials Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. EVX tracks NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EVX and 0.52% for GDXJ.

GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVX and GDXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer