EVTR vs. CFIT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) and CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVTR returned 5.42% vs 12.30% for CFIT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVTR charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for CFIT.

Performance

EVTR vs. CFIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVTR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than CFIT's 5.77% return.

EVTR

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CFIT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 12.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVTR vs. CFIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	0.43%	5.42%
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	5.77%	3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EVTR and CFIT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025	0.62

The correlation between EVTR and CFIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVTR vs. CFIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 42
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CFIT

CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 67
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVTR vs. CFIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVTR	CFIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.25	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.17	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.43	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.92	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	11.00	-4.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVTR vs. CFIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the CFIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVTR and CFIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVTR	CFIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	2.25	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	1.48	-0.14

Drawdowns

EVTR vs. CFIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, roughly equal to the maximum CFIT drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and CFIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVTR	CFIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-4.23%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-4.23%	+1.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-0.35%	-0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-1.20%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	1.12%	-0.22%

Volatility

EVTR vs. CFIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) is 1.41%, while Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that EVTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVTR	CFIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	1.66%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	4.34%	-1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	5.50%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.30%	5.45%	-1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	5.45%	-1.15%

EVTR vs. CFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CFIT's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVTR vs. CFIT - Dividend Comparison

EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than CFIT's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	4.08%	3.14%	0.00%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.67%	4.51%	4.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVTR and CFIT in my portfolio?

EVTR and CFIT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVTR or CFIT?

CFIT has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to EVTR (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVTR dropped -4.08% vs CFIT's -4.23%.

Which ETF is better, EVTR or CFIT?

On 1-year performance, CFIT leads with 12.30% vs 5.42% for EVTR. On fees, EVTR is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EVTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVTR or CFIT?

Over the 1-year period, CFIT has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVTR or CFIT?

EVTR is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVTR or CFIT?

EVTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 4.08% for CFIT.

What is the main difference between EVTR and CFIT?

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EVTR and 0.71% for CFIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.