EVMT vs. TSCM
EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSCM.
Performance
EVMT vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than TSCM's 3.31% return.
EVMT
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 41.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSCM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVMT vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 13.45% | 0.28% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 3.31% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVMT and TSCM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVMT vs. TSCM — Risk / Return Rank
EVMT
TSCM
EVMT vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVMT | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVMT | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.28 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
EVMT vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than TSCM's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and TSCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVMT | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.34% | -14.87% | -33.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.69% | -0.92% | -20.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -6.33% | -28.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility
EVMT vs. TSCM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVMT | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 21.03% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 21.03% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 21.03% | -0.52% |
EVMT vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVMT vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison
EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, while TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 10.40% | 11.80% | 3.62% | 5.49% | 0.86% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVMT and TSCM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSCM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSCM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EVMT.
EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
EVMT is categorized as Commodities, while TSCM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TimesSquare Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.55% for TSCM.
Find the right allocation for EVMT and TSCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer