EVMT vs. CCOM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CCOM.

Performance

EVMT vs. CCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EVMT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 1Y: 30.34%
• 3Y*: 0.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -6.97%

CCOM

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.20%
• 6M: -3.35%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	$529.10	$1.63K	$5.18K
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	$34.42K	$27.21K	$65.95K

EVMT vs. CCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	-1.93%
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	-3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and CCOM is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026	0.27

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. CCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 77
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 60

CCOM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVMT vs. CCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVMT	CCOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	—	—

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. CCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than CCOM's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and CCOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	CCOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-7.44%	-40.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.69%	-5.61%	-22.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.42%	-3.33%	-31.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	CCOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.49%	12.53%	+2.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.28%	12.53%	+7.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.28%	12.53%	+7.75%

EVMT vs. CCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVMT vs. CCOM - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than CCOM's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	11.27%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and CCOM in my portfolio?

EVMT and CCOM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or CCOM?

On fees, EVMT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or CCOM?

EVMT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or CCOM?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 1.26% for CCOM.

What is the main difference between EVMT and CCOM?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.99% for CCOM.