PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVLU vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVLU vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLU achieves a 34.01% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.92% return.


EVLU

1D
-2.27%
1M
15.31%
YTD
34.01%
6M
37.37%
1Y
72.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVLU vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
34.01%38.54%1.61%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%-3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EVLU and VEA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2024

0.74

The correlation between EVLU and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVLU vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVLU
EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVLU vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVLUVEADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.80

2.09

+1.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.71

2.87

+1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.38

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

2.81

+2.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.79

10.94

+9.84

EVLU vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLU Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLU and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVLUVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

2.09

+1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

0.25

+1.99

Drawdowns

EVLU vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLU drawdown since its inception was -17.17%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLU and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVLUVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-60.68%

+43.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-11.63%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-0.90%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-13.29%

+9.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.98%

+0.50%

Volatility

EVLU vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) has a higher volatility of 9.17% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 5.66%. This indicates that EVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVLUVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.17%

5.66%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

13.32%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

15.66%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

16.55%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

17.36%

+2.57%

EVLU vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVLU vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

EVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
3.88%5.20%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVLU and VEA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVLU has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to VEA (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLU dropped -17.17% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 72.04% vs 32.48% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 72.04% return vs 32.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EVLU.

EVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

EVLU is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EVLU and 0.03% for VEA.

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVLU and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer