EVLU vs. ECOW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EVLU (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EVLU tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net) while ECOW tracks the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EVLU returned 66.19% vs 32.75% for ECOW. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVLU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.

Performance

EVLU vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLU achieves a 33.06% return, which is significantly higher than ECOW's 9.99% return.

EVLU

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 6.37%
• YTD: 33.06%
• 6M: 34.87%
• 1Y: 66.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ECOW

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 32.75%
• 3Y*: 18.27%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVLU vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EVLU iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF	33.06%	38.54%	1.21%
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	9.99%	32.50%	-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EVLU and ECOW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.78

The correlation between EVLU and ECOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVLU vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVLU

EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 91
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ECOW

ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 72
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVLU vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVLU	ECOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.34	2.23	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.16	2.99	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.41	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.16	3.94	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.17	12.54	+5.63

EVLU vs. ECOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLU Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the ECOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLU and ECOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVLU vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLU drawdown since its inception was -17.17%, smaller than the maximum ECOW drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLU and ECOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVLU	ECOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.17%	-40.27%	+23.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-8.35%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.96%	-6.18%	+3.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-11.03%	+7.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.65%	2.62%	+1.03%

Volatility

EVLU vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) at 5.37%. This indicates that EVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVLU	ECOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.82%	5.37%	+3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.33%	11.74%	+5.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.95%	14.77%	+5.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	17.74%	+2.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	20.14%	+0.10%

EVLU vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVLU vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

EVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than ECOW's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	4.56%	5.20%	7.35%	5.46%	7.50%	4.39%	3.35%	8.08%
EVLU iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF	3.66%	5.20%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVLU and ECOW in my portfolio?

EVLU and ECOW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVLU or ECOW?

EVLU has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to ECOW (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLU dropped -17.17% vs ECOW's -40.27%.

Which ETF is better, EVLU or ECOW?

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 66.19% vs 32.75% for ECOW. On fees, EVLU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ECOW has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVLU or ECOW?

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 66.19% return vs 32.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVLU or ECOW?

EVLU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVLU or ECOW?

ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 3.66% for EVLU.

What is the main difference between EVLU and ECOW?

EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EVLU and 0.70% for ECOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.