EVLU vs. TLT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EVLU (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVLU is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EVLU returned 76.75% vs 4.93% for TLT. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVLU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.

Performance

EVLU vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLU achieves a 37.12% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.

EVLU

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: 17.76%
• YTD: 37.12%
• 6M: 40.51%
• 1Y: 76.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TLT

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: -1.80%
• 5Y*: -6.31%
• 10Y*: -1.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVLU vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EVLU iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF	37.12%	38.54%	1.61%
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	-0.27%	4.25%	-11.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EVLU and TLT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2024	0.15

The correlation between EVLU and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EVLU vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVLU

EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 93
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 91

TLT

TLT Risk / Return Rank: 16
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVLU vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVLU	TLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.09	0.51	+3.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.03	0.80	+4.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	1.09	+0.63
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.03	0.65	+5.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.39	1.63	+20.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVLU vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLU Sharpe Ratio is 4.09, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLU and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVLU	TLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.09	0.51	+3.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.34	0.26	+2.09

Drawdowns

EVLU vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLU drawdown since its inception was -17.17%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLU and TLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVLU	TLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.17%	-48.35%	+31.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-7.58%	-5.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-40.44%	+40.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-13.82%	+10.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.04%	+0.43%

Volatility

EVLU vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.76%. This indicates that EVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVLU	TLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.68%	2.76%	+5.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	6.50%	+9.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.88%	9.77%	+9.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.86%	15.87%	+3.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.86%	14.91%	+4.95%

EVLU vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVLU vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

EVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVLU iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF	3.79%	5.20%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	4.59%	4.43%	4.30%	3.38%	2.67%	1.50%	1.50%	2.27%	2.63%	2.43%	2.60%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVLU and TLT in my portfolio?

EVLU and TLT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVLU or TLT?

EVLU has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLU dropped -17.17% vs TLT's -48.35%.

Which ETF is better, EVLU or TLT?

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 76.75% vs 4.93% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVLU or TLT?

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 76.75% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVLU or TLT?

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EVLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVLU or TLT?

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 3.79% for EVLU.

What is the main difference between EVLU and TLT?

EVLU is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EVLU and 0.15% for TLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.