EVHY vs. PHYD
EVHY (Eaton Vance High Yield ETF) and PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVHY returned 7.04% vs 8.46% for PHYD. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EVHY charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PHYD.
Performance
EVHY vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVHY achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than PHYD's 2.61% return.
EVHY
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 8.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVHY vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EVHY Eaton Vance High Yield ETF | 1.33% | 9.14% | 6.39% | 8.90% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 2.61% | 8.84% | 7.35% | 9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVHY and PHYD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EVHY and PHYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVHY vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank
EVHY
PHYD
EVHY vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance High Yield ETF (EVHY) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVHY | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.57 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | 4.11 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.53 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.99 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 16.58 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVHY | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.57 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.21 | 1.76 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
EVHY vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVHY drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum PHYD drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVHY and PHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVHY | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -4.33% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -2.10% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -0.62% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 0.50% | +0.02% |
Volatility
EVHY vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance High Yield ETF (EVHY) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) at 0.93%. This indicates that EVHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVHY | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 0.93% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 2.50% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 3.31% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 4.58% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 4.58% | -0.05% |
EVHY vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVHY has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVHY vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison
EVHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, less than PHYD's 9.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EVHY Eaton Vance High Yield ETF | 7.19% | 7.39% | 7.66% | 1.44% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 9.01% | 6.63% | 6.80% | 6.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVHY and PHYD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVHY has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to PHYD (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVHY dropped -3.71% vs PHYD's -4.33%.
On 1-year performance, PHYD leads with 8.46% vs 7.04% for EVHY. On fees, EVHY is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, PHYD has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVHY is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 9.01%, compared with 7.19% for EVHY.
They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EVHY and 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVHY and PHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer