PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVFGX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVFGX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVFGX achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than TSAIX's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EVFGX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.


EVFGX

1D
0.53%
1M
5.62%
YTD
14.08%
6M
15.01%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
10.37%

TSAIX

1D
0.62%
1M
4.96%
YTD
10.64%
6M
11.38%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVFGX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVFGX
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund
14.08%19.07%9.32%15.33%-15.99%11.00%19.54%24.65%-11.29%19.61%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
10.64%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.27%22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EVFGX and TSAIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2016

0.95

The correlation between EVFGX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVFGX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVFGX
EVFGX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EVFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EVFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVFGX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVFGXTSAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.65

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.72

11.60

+2.12

EVFGX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVFGX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVFGXTSAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.11

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.60

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.72

-0.05

Drawdowns

EVFGX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVFGX drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, roughly equal to the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFGX and TSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVFGXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-34.58%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-10.28%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.45%

-17.29%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

-28.28%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-34.58%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-4.92%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.34%

-0.11%

Volatility

EVFGX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) at 3.72%. This indicates that EVFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVFGXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.72%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

10.26%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

12.92%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

16.25%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

17.65%

-1.99%

EVFGX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVFGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVFGX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

EVFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.00%, more than TSAIX's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVFGX
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund
17.00%19.39%0.00%1.37%0.96%17.87%2.97%0.74%8.11%9.49%0.31%0.00%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
6.67%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EVFGX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EVFGX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to TSAIX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVFGX dropped -33.61% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

EVFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVFGX and TSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer