PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVFGX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVFGX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVFGX achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than FYMIX's 9.38% return.


EVFGX

1D
-0.92%
1M
3.43%
YTD
13.03%
6M
13.66%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
10.26%

FYMIX

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.11%
YTD
9.38%
6M
10.23%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVFGX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EVFGX
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund
13.03%19.07%9.32%15.33%-12.39%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
9.38%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EVFGX and FYMIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022

0.93

The correlation between EVFGX and FYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVFGX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVFGX
EVFGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EVFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EVFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVFGX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVFGXFYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.71

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.89

11.73

+1.16

EVFGX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVFGX and FYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVFGXFYMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.21

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.66

0.00

Drawdowns

EVFGX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVFGX drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFGX and FYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVFGXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-22.70%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-8.80%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.45%

-12.72%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.69%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-5.64%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.03%

+0.20%

Volatility

EVFGX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) at 3.60%. This indicates that EVFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVFGXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

3.60%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

8.88%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

10.81%

+2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

12.73%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

12.73%

+2.93%

EVFGX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVFGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVFGX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

EVFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.15%, more than FYMIX's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EVFGX
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund
17.15%19.39%0.00%1.37%0.96%17.87%2.97%0.74%8.11%9.49%0.31%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.37%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EVFGX and FYMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EVFGX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FYMIX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVFGX dropped -33.61% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.

FYMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVFGX and FYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer