PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAL.L vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EVAL.L is traded in GBP, while VGT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VGT values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.02% return. Over the past 10 years, EVAL.L has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 11.80%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.56% annualized return.


EVAL.L

1D
0.67%
1M
4.21%
YTD
11.21%
6M
14.15%
1Y
34.42%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
11.80%

VGT

1D
-0.88%
1M
16.04%
YTD
31.02%
6M
27.87%
1Y
59.85%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
23.33%
10Y*
26.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.21%41.81%4.36%11.02%1.33%19.13%-2.54%16.22%-13.77%15.54%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.02%13.10%31.56%45.03%-21.34%31.69%41.75%42.97%8.53%25.23%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAL.L and VGT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015

0.32

The correlation between EVAL.L and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAL.L
VGT

Financial Services

21.5%
0.5%

Industrials

18.0%
0.4%

Healthcare

13.2%
0.0%

Technology

10.6%
98.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.2%
0.0%

Energy

5.5%
0.3%

Utilities

5.3%

-

Communication Services

4.0%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Financial Services

EVAL.L
21.5%
VGT
0.5%

Industrials

EVAL.L
18.0%
VGT
0.4%

Healthcare

EVAL.L
13.2%
VGT
0.0%

Technology

EVAL.L
10.6%
VGT
98.5%

Consumer Defensive

EVAL.L
8.6%
VGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

EVAL.L
6.6%
VGT
0.1%

Basic Materials

EVAL.L
6.2%
VGT
0.0%

Energy

EVAL.L
5.5%
VGT
0.3%

Utilities

EVAL.L
5.3%
VGT

-

Communication Services

EVAL.L
4.0%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

EVAL.L
0.7%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAL.L vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAL.L
EVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVAL.LVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.49

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.68

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

9.99

+2.61

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAL.L and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAL.LVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

3.03

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.98

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

1.09

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.85

-0.49

Drawdowns

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAL.LVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-36.26%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-16.33%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-29.76%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.61%

-29.76%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.77%

-29.76%

-8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-2.00%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-5.92%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

6.01%

-3.28%

Volatility

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) is 4.12%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that EVAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAL.LVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

6.07%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

14.98%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

19.85%

-6.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

23.83%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

24.39%

-7.42%

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EVAL.L vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

EVAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVAL.L and VGT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EVAL.L.

EVAL.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.09% for VGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer