PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
3.25%41.81%4.36%11.02%0.94%
SPX4.L
SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF
3.87%0.12%14.37%10.71%-1.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPX4.L's 3.87% return.


EVAL.L

1D
2.17%
1M
-3.97%
YTD
3.25%
6M
13.90%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
11.33%

SPX4.L

1D
1.85%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
3.87%
6M
6.37%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPX4.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAL.L
EVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPX4.L
SPX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SPX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVAL.LSPX4.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

0.77

+1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

1.13

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.16

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

2.01

+1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.43

5.69

+5.75

EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the SPX4.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAL.L and SPX4.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAL.LSPX4.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

0.77

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.30

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between EVAL.L and SPX4.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EVAL.L nor SPX4.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, which is greater than SPX4.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and SPX4.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAL.LSPX4.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-26.24%

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-12.82%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-3.97%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-8.09%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.38%

+0.37%

Volatility

EVAL.L vs. SPX4.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) at 5.04%. This indicates that EVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPX4.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EVAL.LSPX4.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

5.04%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

10.05%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

18.15%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

22.79%

-8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

22.79%

-5.83%