EUSB vs. BNDP
EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) and BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - EUSB tracks the Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index while BNDP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EUSB charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDP.
Performance
EUSB vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUSB achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than BNDP's 0.42% return.
EUSB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDP
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.33% | 0.22% |
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.42% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUSB and BNDP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUSB vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank
EUSB
BNDP
EUSB vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUSB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUSB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.29 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
EUSB vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSB and BNDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUSB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.87% | -2.60% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.23% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -0.86% | -5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | — | — |
Volatility
EUSB vs. BNDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUSB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 3.65% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 3.65% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 3.65% | +1.77% |
EUSB vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EUSB vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison
EUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than BNDP's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.08% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EUSB and BNDP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for EUSB.
EUSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.
EUSB tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index, while BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EUSB and 0.05% for BNDP.
Find the right allocation for EUSB and BNDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer