EUSB vs. SUSB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) and iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB).
EUSB and SUSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2020. SUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Jul 12, 2017. Both EUSB and SUSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EUSB or SUSB.
Key characteristics
EUSB | SUSB | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 2.02% | 4.31% |
1Y Return | 8.43% | 7.88% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -1.90% | 1.36% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.46 | 2.94 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.16 | 4.73 |
Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.60 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.58 | 1.76 |
Martin Ratio | 5.61 | 18.77 |
Ulcer Index | 1.52% | 0.42% |
Daily Std Dev | 5.87% | 2.70% |
Max Drawdown | -17.86% | -13.25% |
Current Drawdown | -7.43% | -1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUSB and SUSB is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EUSB vs. SUSB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EUSB achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than SUSB's 4.31% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EUSB vs. SUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EUSB and SUSB have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EUSB vs. SUSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) and iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EUSB vs. SUSB - Dividend Comparison
EUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than SUSB's 3.64% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.56% | 3.08% | 2.22% | 1.10% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 3.64% | 2.80% | 1.73% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.82% | 3.05% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
EUSB vs. SUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, which is greater than SUSB's maximum drawdown of -13.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSB and SUSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EUSB vs. SUSB - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) at 0.66%. This indicates that EUSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.