EUSA vs. PPI

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) and PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUSA is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS. EUSA is passively managed, while PPI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EUSA returned 15.47%/yr vs 21.28%/yr for PPI. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUSA charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPI.

Performance

EUSA vs. PPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than PPI's 14.00% return.

EUSA

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 8.05%
• 1Y: 17.54%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 11.40%

PPI

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -5.36%
• YTD: 14.00%
• 6M: 15.39%
• 1Y: 36.03%
• 3Y*: 21.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUSA vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	8.32%	10.24%	14.64%	17.72%	-17.13%	-0.12%
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	14.00%	30.05%	6.43%	11.33%	4.04%	0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and PPI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021	0.74

The correlation between EUSA and PPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUSA vs. PPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EUSA	PPI
Technology	21.3%	0.6%
Industrials	14.7%	31.4%
Financial Services	14.4%	-
Healthcare	10.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	0.6%
Utilities	5.6%	18.7%
Real Estate	5.5%	15.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	-
Communication Services	4.8%	-
Energy	4.6%	23.1%
Basic Materials	4.1%	10.6%

Return for Risk

EUSA vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA

EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 46
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PPI

PPI Risk / Return Rank: 76
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EUSA	PPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.27	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.96	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.40	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	4.54	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	14.62	-5.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUSA vs. PPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the PPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSA and PPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EUSA	PPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	2.27	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.77	-0.07

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than PPI's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and PPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUSA	PPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-24.54%	-14.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.82%	-7.98%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.20%	-20.70%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-5.36%	+3.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-6.49%	+1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.47%	-0.50%

Volatility

EUSA vs. PPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 3.29%, while Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUSA	PPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	4.63%	-1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	12.84%	-3.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.91%	15.95%	-4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.96%	19.07%	-2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.34%	19.07%	-0.73%

EUSA vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PPI's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUSA vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than PPI's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	1.53%	1.63%	1.47%	1.53%	1.73%	1.23%	1.45%	1.49%	2.01%	1.50%	1.59%	2.21%
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	1.03%	1.06%	0.60%	2.87%	2.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUSA and PPI in my portfolio?

EUSA and PPI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EUSA or PPI?

PPI has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to EUSA (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSA dropped -39.16% vs PPI's -24.54%.

Which ETF is better, EUSA or PPI?

On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 21.28% vs 15.47% for EUSA. On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EUSA or PPI?

Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 21.28% return vs 15.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUSA or PPI?

EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUSA or PPI?

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.03% for PPI.

What is the main difference between EUSA and PPI?

EUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PPI is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: iShares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for EUSA and 0.58% for PPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.