EUM vs. USD
EUM (ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - EUM is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while USD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUM returned -10.61%/yr vs 62.72%/yr for USD. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EUM vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -21.23% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 92.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EUM has underperformed USD with an annualized return of -10.61%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 62.72% annualized return.
EUM
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -21.23%
- 6M
- -21.58%
- 1Y
- -30.32%
- 3Y*
- -15.89%
- 5Y*
- -5.11%
- 10Y*
- -10.61%
USD
- 1D
- 4.73%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 92.18%
- 6M
- 86.88%
- 1Y
- 185.02%
- 3Y*
- 118.50%
- 5Y*
- 64.73%
- 10Y*
- 62.72%
EUM vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | -21.23% | -22.61% | -0.83% | -3.89% | 21.11% | -1.32% | -24.37% | -15.27% | 14.60% | -28.08% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 92.18% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUM and USD is -0.67, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2007 | -0.63 |
The correlation between EUM and USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.67 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUM vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUM
USD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EUM
USD
Basic Materials
EUM
-
USD
-
Communication Services
EUM
-
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
EUM
-
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
EUM
-
USD
-
Energy
EUM
-
USD
Healthcare
EUM
-
USD
-
Industrials
EUM
-
USD
-
Real Estate
EUM
-
USD
-
Technology
EUM
-
USD
Utilities
EUM
-
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUM vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
EUM
USD
EUM vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUM | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.38 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 5.86 | -6.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | 16.16 | -17.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUM vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than USD's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUM | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -88.63% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -31.80% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.97% | -64.46% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.87% | -77.85% | +26.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.83% | -77.85% | +10.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.89% | -11.21% | -81.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -32.29% | -44.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 11.50% | +5.06% |
Volatility
EUM vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) is 11.91%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 33.79%. This indicates that EUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUM | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.91% | 33.79% | -21.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 53.90% | -32.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.14% | 67.84% | -44.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 77.74% | -57.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 69.82% | -49.11% |
EUM vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EUM and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EUM vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than USD's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets | 4.28% | 3.98% | 4.22% | 3.86% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 1.35% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.30% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUM and USD have a correlation of -0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (33.79%) compared to EUM (11.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUM dropped -93.19% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 62.72% vs -10.61% for EUM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EUM has been the lower-risk option at 11.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 62.72% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUM and USD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EUM has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.30% for USD.
EUM is categorized as Inverse Equities, while USD is Leveraged Equities. EUM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUM and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer