PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUM vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUM vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -21.40% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 29.29% return. Over the past 10 years, EUM has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of -10.22%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 30.04% annualized return.


EUM

1D
1.09%
1M
-5.64%
YTD
-21.40%
6M
-22.97%
1Y
-32.85%
3Y*
-15.90%
5Y*
-5.09%
10Y*
-10.22%

UPRO

1D
1.09%
1M
13.26%
YTD
29.29%
6M
27.72%
1Y
83.10%
3Y*
53.48%
5Y*
23.40%
10Y*
30.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUM vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
-21.40%-22.61%-0.83%-3.89%21.11%-1.32%-24.37%-15.27%14.60%-28.08%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
29.29%31.88%63.57%68.53%-56.84%98.64%10.09%102.30%-25.11%71.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EUM and UPRO is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009

-0.73

The correlation between EUM and UPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUM vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUM
UPRO

Financial Services

47.1%
28.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.8%

Industrials

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

17.8%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

EUM
47.1%
UPRO
28.8%

Basic Materials

EUM

-

UPRO
0.8%

Communication Services

EUM

-

UPRO
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EUM

-

UPRO
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

EUM

-

UPRO
2.0%

Energy

EUM

-

UPRO
1.4%

Healthcare

EUM

-

UPRO
3.8%

Industrials

EUM

-

UPRO
3.4%

Real Estate

EUM

-

UPRO
0.8%

Technology

EUM

-

UPRO
17.8%

Utilities

EUM

-

UPRO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUM vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUM
EUM Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
EUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUM Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUM Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUM vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUMUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.72

1.37

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

3.12

-4.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.91

13.16

-15.07

EUM vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUM Sharpe Ratio is -1.61, which is lower than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUM and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUMUPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.61

2.37

-3.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.47

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.50

0.56

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

0.65

-1.01

Drawdowns

EUM vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -93.07%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUMUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.07%

-76.82%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.25%

-26.78%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.06%

-48.87%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.02%

-63.94%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.27%

-76.82%

+8.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.91%

-1.02%

-91.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.17%

-14.41%

-62.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.41%

6.33%

+11.08%

Volatility

EUM vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) at 8.29%. This indicates that EUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUMUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

8.29%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

26.61%

-8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

35.33%

-14.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

50.31%

-31.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

53.73%

-33.19%

EUM vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUM vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than UPRO's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
4.54%3.98%4.22%3.86%0.82%0.00%0.15%1.35%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.67%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUM and UPRO have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUM has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to UPRO (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUM dropped -93.07% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 30.04% vs -10.22% for EUM. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 8.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 30.04% return vs -10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EUM.

EUM has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.67% for UPRO.

EUM is categorized as Inverse Equities, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. EUM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EUM and 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUM and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer