PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EUM vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EUM vs. IEMG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EUM (ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUM is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUM returned -10.61%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for IEMG. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. EUM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.

Performance

EUM vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -21.23% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 23.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EUM has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of -10.61%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.

EUM

1D
-1.02%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-21.23%
6M
-21.58%
1Y
-30.32%
3Y*
-15.89%
5Y*
-5.11%
10Y*
-10.61%

IEMG

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
23.22%
6M
23.74%
1Y
41.51%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUM vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets		-21.23%-22.61%-0.83%-3.89%21.11%-1.32%-24.37%-15.27%14.60%-28.08%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF		23.22%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EUM and IEMG is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

-0.99

The correlation between EUM and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUM vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EUM
IEMG

Financial Services

52.0%
16.7%

Basic Materials

-

6.3%

Communication Services

-

5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.8%

Energy

-

3.3%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Industrials

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Technology

-

42.1%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Financial Services

EUM
52.0%
IEMG
16.7%

Basic Materials

EUM

-

IEMG
6.3%

Communication Services

EUM

-

IEMG
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EUM

-

IEMG
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

EUM

-

IEMG
2.8%

Energy

EUM

-

IEMG
3.3%

Healthcare

EUM

-

IEMG
3.2%

Industrials

EUM

-

IEMG
8.0%

Real Estate

EUM

-

IEMG
1.6%

Technology

EUM

-

IEMG
42.1%

Utilities

EUM

-

IEMG
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Often compared with EUM:
EUM vs. QQQEUM vs. MSFDEUM vs. SPYEUM vs. DOGEUM vs. TQQQEUM vs. CARDEUM vs. MSTZ
Often compared with IEMG:
IEMG vs. VWOIEMG vs. EEMIEMG vs. IEFAIEMG vs. EMXCIEMG vs. SCHEIEMG vs. IXUSIEMG vs. SPY

Return for Risk

EUM vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EUM
EUM Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
EUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUM Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUM vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EUMIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.31
1.90

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.99
2.46

-4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.37

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

3.16

-4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.84

11.46

-13.30

EUM vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUM Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUM and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUM vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and IEMG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EUMIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.19%

-38.71%

-54.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.23%

-13.21%

-20.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.97%

-17.21%

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.87%

-35.75%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

-38.71%

-29.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.89%

-4.45%

-88.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.20%

-12.93%

-64.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.56%

3.63%

+12.93%

Volatility

EUM vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) have volatilities of 11.91% and 11.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EUMIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.91%

11.67%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.01%

20.13%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.14%

22.00%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

18.99%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

20.19%

+0.52%

EUM vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUM vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than IEMG's 2.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets		4.28%3.98%4.22%3.86%0.82%0.00%0.15%1.35%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF		2.19%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

EUM and IEMG have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUM has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to IEMG (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUM dropped -93.19% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.62% vs -10.61% for EUM. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 11.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.62% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EUM.

EUM has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.19% for IEMG.

EUM is categorized as Inverse Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. EUM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EUM and 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUM and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer