PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUM vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EUM vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EUM vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
-4.65%-22.61%-0.83%-3.89%21.11%4.95%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-22.79%-11.19%104.45%137.33%-63.91%-31.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -22.79% return.


EUM

1D
-0.68%
1M
6.85%
YTD
-4.65%
6M
-6.77%
1Y
-23.48%
3Y*
-10.11%
5Y*
-2.28%
10Y*
-8.57%

BITO

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-22.79%
6M
-43.10%
1Y
-23.27%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EUM vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EUM and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

EUM vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUM
EUM Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
EUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUM Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUM vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUMBITODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.15

-0.52

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.65

-0.50

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.94

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

-0.42

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-0.89

-0.02

EUM vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUM Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUM and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUMBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.15

-0.52

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

-0.08

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between EUM and BITO is -0.37. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

EUM vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than BITO's 80.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
3.74%3.98%4.22%3.86%0.82%0.00%0.15%1.35%0.88%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
80.47%78.29%61.59%15.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EUM vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -92.17%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and BITO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EUMBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.17%

-77.86%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.57%

-50.05%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.40%

-46.75%

-44.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.02%

-36.57%

-40.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.03%

23.73%

+2.30%

Volatility

EUM vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) is 9.82%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that EUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EUMBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.82%

12.84%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.41%

36.71%

-21.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

45.32%

-24.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.63%

55.77%

-37.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

55.77%

-35.43%