EUM vs. BITO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EUM (ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUM is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-100%), while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. EUM is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EUM returned -15.89%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for BITO. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EUM vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUM achieves a -21.23% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -33.32% return.

EUM

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: -21.23%
• 6M: -21.58%
• 1Y: -30.32%
• 3Y*: -15.89%
• 5Y*: -5.11%
• 10Y*: -10.61%

BITO

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -22.17%
• YTD: -33.32%
• 6M: -33.16%
• 1Y: -47.20%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUM vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets	-21.23%	-22.61%	-0.83%	-3.89%	21.11%	3.50%
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-33.32%	-11.19%	104.45%	137.33%	-63.91%	-29.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EUM and BITO is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021	-0.38

The correlation between EUM and BITO shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (1 year) to -0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EUM vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUM

EUM Risk / Return Rank: 1
EUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
EUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EUM Omega Ratio Rank: 1
EUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EUM Martin Ratio Rank: 0

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUM vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EUM	BITO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.31	-1.07	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.99	-1.65	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	0.82	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	-0.88	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.84	-1.49	-0.34

EUM vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUM Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is comparable to the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUM and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EUM vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUM drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUM and BITO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUM	BITO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.19%	-77.86%	-15.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.23%	-54.01%	+20.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.97%	-54.01%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.89%	-54.01%	-38.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-77.20%	-36.89%	-40.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.56%	31.65%	-15.09%

Volatility

EUM vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) is 11.91%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that EUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUM	BITO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.91%	12.96%	-1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.01%	34.32%	-13.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.14%	44.16%	-21.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.78%	55.00%	-35.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	55.00%	-34.29%

EUM vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EUM and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EUM vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

EUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than BITO's 74.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	74.68%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EUM ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets	4.28%	3.98%	4.22%	3.86%	0.82%	0.00%	0.15%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUM and BITO in my portfolio?

EUM and BITO have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EUM or BITO?

BITO has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to EUM (11.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUM dropped -93.19% vs BITO's -77.86%.

Which ETF is better, EUM or BITO?

On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 17.05% vs -15.89% for EUM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EUM has been the lower-risk option at 11.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EUM or BITO?

Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 17.05% return vs -15.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUM or BITO?

EUM and BITO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUM or BITO?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 74.68%, compared with 4.28% for EUM.

What is the main difference between EUM and BITO?

EUM is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BITO is Cryptocurrency.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.07 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.