EUFN vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUFN returned 18.43%/yr vs 17.78%/yr for FLKR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUFN charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

EUFN vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUFN achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 98.10% return.

EUFN

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 9.10%
• 1Y: 28.57%
• 3Y*: 32.04%
• 5Y*: 18.43%
• 10Y*: 13.48%

FLKR

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 98.10%
• 6M: 113.45%
• 1Y: 191.57%
• 3Y*: 45.52%
• 5Y*: 17.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUFN vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF	4.75%	65.73%	17.20%	26.15%	-8.78%	19.13%	-8.55%	20.73%	-23.14%	2.38%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	98.10%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EUFN and FLKR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.57

The correlation between EUFN and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUFN vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EUFN	FLKR
Financial Services	97.1%	7.6%
Technology	1.0%	64.3%
Industrials	0.4%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	6.0%
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.5%
Energy	-	0.4%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

EUFN vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUFN

EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 42
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUFN vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EUFN	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	4.08	-2.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	3.94	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.58	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	8.11	-6.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.24	28.21	-21.97

EUFN vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUFN and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EUFN vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUFN drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFN and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUFN	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.25%	-50.06%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.77%	-23.03%	+8.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.95%	-26.39%	+10.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.15%	-49.51%	+14.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-9.25%	+9.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.53%	-22.03%	+7.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	6.61%	-2.38%

Volatility

EUFN vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) is 6.96%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 25.85%. This indicates that EUFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUFN	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	25.85%	-18.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.05%	42.11%	-25.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	45.82%	-25.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	29.58%	-7.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.53%	28.37%	-3.84%

EUFN vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUFN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUFN vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FLKR's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF	3.41%	3.57%	5.36%	5.00%	4.24%	4.15%	1.38%	4.55%	6.48%	3.04%	4.03%	3.65%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.95%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUFN and FLKR in my portfolio?

EUFN and FLKR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EUFN or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to EUFN (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUFN dropped -53.25% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, EUFN or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, EUFN leads with 18.43% vs 17.78% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUFN has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EUFN or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 17.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUFN or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EUFN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUFN or FLKR?

EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.95% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between EUFN and FLKR?

EUFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EUFN and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.