EUDV vs. FEZ
EUDV (ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF) and FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EUDV tracks the MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index while FEZ tracks the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUDV returned 5.53%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for FEZ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUDV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
EUDV vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUDV achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than FEZ's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EUDV has underperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 5.53%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
EUDV
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
FEZ
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
EUDV vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 0.21% | 14.05% | 0.03% | 20.41% | -24.87% | 19.56% | 5.81% | 25.89% | -11.12% | 21.57% |
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 6.43% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUDV and FEZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2015 | 0.77 |
The correlation between EUDV and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUDV vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUDV
FEZ
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
EUDV
FEZ
Healthcare
EUDV
FEZ
Financial Services
EUDV
FEZ
Technology
EUDV
FEZ
Basic Materials
EUDV
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
EUDV
FEZ
Utilities
EUDV
FEZ
Communication Services
EUDV
FEZ
Energy
EUDV
FEZ
Real Estate
EUDV
FEZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
EUDV
-
FEZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUDV vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
EUDV
FEZ
EUDV vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUDV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.42 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 4.82 | -5.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUDV vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUDV drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDV and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUDV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.51% | -64.21% | +26.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -13.63% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -15.85% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.51% | -35.05% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.51% | -39.69% | +2.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -2.33% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -17.04% | +8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 3.99% | -0.02% |
Volatility
EUDV vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) is 3.91%, while State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that EUDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUDV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 5.85% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | 15.57% | -4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 18.40% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 20.70% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 20.75% | -3.58% |
EUDV vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUDV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUDV vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
EUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than FEZ's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 1.73% | 1.74% | 1.92% | 1.87% | 1.77% | 2.30% | 1.27% | 2.20% | 2.22% | 2.33% | 2.53% | 0.37% |
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.64% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUDV and FEZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEZ has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to EUDV (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDV dropped -37.51% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.53% vs 5.53% for EUDV. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, EUDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EUDV.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 1.73% for EUDV.
EUDV tracks MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EUDV and 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUDV and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer