PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUDG vs. EFNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUDG vs. EFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDG achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than EFNL's 21.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EUDG has underperformed EFNL with an annualized return of 7.97%, while EFNL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.07% annualized return.


EUDG

1D
-1.04%
1M
2.52%
YTD
1.93%
6M
4.90%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
7.97%

EFNL

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.63%
YTD
21.03%
6M
25.68%
1Y
48.56%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUDG vs. EFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.93%28.94%-4.30%19.36%-18.24%16.87%11.29%28.52%-15.19%29.66%
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
21.03%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%23.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDG and EFNL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014

0.77

The correlation between EUDG and EFNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUDG vs. EFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUDG
EFNL

Industrials

23.8%
20.8%

Healthcare

17.7%
3.5%

Financial Services

15.2%
26.0%

Consumer Defensive

12.2%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
6.6%

Technology

5.1%
21.4%

Energy

4.4%
5.2%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.3%
6.3%

Utilities

1.8%
4.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.7%

Industrials

EUDG
23.8%
EFNL
20.8%

Healthcare

EUDG
17.7%
EFNL
3.5%

Financial Services

EUDG
15.2%
EFNL
26.0%

Consumer Defensive

EUDG
12.2%
EFNL
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EUDG
12.2%
EFNL
6.6%

Technology

EUDG
5.1%
EFNL
21.4%

Energy

EUDG
4.4%
EFNL
5.2%

Communication Services

EUDG
4.3%
EFNL
2.6%

Basic Materials

EUDG
3.3%
EFNL
6.3%

Utilities

EUDG
1.8%
EFNL
4.0%

Real Estate

EUDG
0.1%
EFNL
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUDG vs. EFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUDG
EUDG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EUDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUDG vs. EFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUDGEFNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.47

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

6.16

-5.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

21.80

-18.61

EUDG vs. EFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the EFNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDG and EFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUDGEFNLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.83

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.34

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.50

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.47

-0.13

Drawdowns

EUDG vs. EFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDG drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum EFNL drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDG and EFNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUDGEFNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-38.70%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-7.92%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-18.19%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.30%

-38.70%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

-38.70%

+4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.00%

-0.44%

-4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-10.93%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

2.23%

+1.50%

Volatility

EUDG vs. EFNL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) is 5.23%, while iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that EUDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUDGEFNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

6.77%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

13.87%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

17.28%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

19.60%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

20.09%

-2.39%

EUDG vs. EFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUDG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EFNL's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUDG vs. EFNL - Dividend Comparison

EUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than EFNL's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
2.81%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.25%2.19%2.41%2.14%3.07%2.98%1.87%2.30%3.00%1.55%2.49%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUDG and EFNL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFNL has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to EUDG (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDG dropped -33.76% vs EFNL's -38.70%.

On 10-year performance, EFNL leads with 10.07% vs 7.97% for EUDG. On fees, EFNL is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, EUDG has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFNL has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFNL is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for EUDG.

EFNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.25% for EUDG.

EUDG tracks WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Index, while EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for EUDG and 0.53% for EFNL.

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUDG and EFNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer