ETV vs. KRP
ETV (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund) and KRP (Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP) are both stocks. ETV operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while KRP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, ETV returned 7.27%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for KRP. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ETV vs. KRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETV achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than KRP's 32.35% return.
ETV
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 21.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
KRP
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 6M
- 37.01%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
ETV vs. KRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 8.19% | 8.63% | 27.67% | 9.94% | -19.73% | 18.41% | 13.03% | 21.25% | -4.29% | 8.99% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 32.35% | -18.60% | 20.43% | 0.76% | 36.93% | 89.97% | -48.94% | 38.62% | -8.93% | -5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETV and KRP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ETV and KRP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ETV:
$1.74B
KRP:
$1.76B
ETV:
$4.95
KRP:
$0.60
ETV:
3.01
KRP:
24.59
ETV:
0.10
KRP:
0.09
ETV:
5.73
KRP:
5.71
ETV:
0.95
KRP:
3.37
ETV:
$303.84M
KRP:
$309.11M
ETV:
$149.51M
KRP:
$319.28M
ETV:
$578.17M
KRP:
$177.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETV vs. KRP — Risk / Return Rank
ETV
KRP
ETV vs. KRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETV | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.11 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 0.62 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 1.58 | +8.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETV vs. KRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETV drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum KRP drawdown of -80.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETV and KRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETV | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -80.91% | +28.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -20.50% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.27% | -27.58% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.71% | -27.58% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.95% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -19.37% | +13.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 7.97% | -5.94% |
Volatility
ETV vs. KRP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) is 3.62%, while Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that ETV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETV | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 6.60% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 16.81% | -6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 23.01% | -10.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 28.34% | -11.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 41.29% | -22.00% |
Dividends
ETV vs. KRP - Dividend Comparison
ETV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, less than KRP's 10.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 7.99% | 8.30% | 8.18% | 9.24% | 10.57% | 7.94% | 8.66% | 8.89% | 9.86% | 8.65% | 8.96% | 8.69% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 10.22% | 13.61% | 10.78% | 11.50% | 11.26% | 8.36% | 11.00% | 9.29% | 12.22% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ETV vs. KRP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ETV and KRP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRP has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to ETV (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETV dropped -52.11% vs KRP's -80.91%.
ETV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETV and KRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer