ETV vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ETV or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between ETV and UTF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ETV vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ETV:
0.59
UTF:
1.24
ETV:
0.95
UTF:
1.66
ETV:
1.14
UTF:
1.24
ETV:
0.57
UTF:
1.68
ETV:
2.38
UTF:
4.83
ETV:
4.88%
UTF:
4.18%
ETV:
19.75%
UTF:
16.23%
ETV:
-52.11%
UTF:
-72.62%
ETV:
-9.25%
UTF:
-0.44%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETV achieves a -6.97% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ETV has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 7.70%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.
ETV
-6.97%
11.40%
-1.49%
9.55%
8.43%
7.70%
UTF
9.30%
6.60%
5.85%
18.63%
12.61%
9.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ETV vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ETV
UTF
ETV vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ETV vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
ETV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than UTF's 7.27% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 9.15% | 8.18% | 9.24% | 10.57% | 7.94% | 8.66% | 8.89% | 9.86% | 8.65% | 8.96% | 8.69% | 9.46% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.27% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% | 6.51% |
Drawdowns
ETV vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETV drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETV and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ETV vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 7.90%. This indicates that ETV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ETV vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities