ETTGX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
ETTGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 1996. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
ETTGX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETTGX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund | -5.61% | 16.69% | 25.16% | 28.24% | -20.11% | 24.69% | 23.05% | 29.32% | -5.28% | 22.35% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETTGX achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ETTGX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 13.45%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
ETTGX
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -5.61%
- 6M
- -3.40%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETTGX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETTGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETTGX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
ETTGX
FASGX
ETTGX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETTGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.41 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.01 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.00 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 8.74 | -3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETTGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.41 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.55 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.71 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.60 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETTGX and FASGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETTGX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
ETTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund | 3.16% | 2.98% | 2.11% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.62% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.88% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
ETTGX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETTGX drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETTGX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETTGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -47.35% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -9.07% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.03% | -23.54% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.98% | -27.20% | -5.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -5.77% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -6.74% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.07% | +0.69% |
Volatility
ETTGX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 5.30%. This indicates that ETTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETTGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.30% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 8.12% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 13.00% | +5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 12.18% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 12.58% | +5.73% |