ETTGX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ETTGX (Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both mutual funds - ETTGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FASGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, ETTGX returned 14.91%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for FASGX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETTGX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

ETTGX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETTGX achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ETTGX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 14.91%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.

ETTGX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.74%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 21.47%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 14.91%

FASGX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETTGX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund	8.74%	16.69%	25.16%	28.24%	-20.11%	24.69%	23.05%	29.32%	-5.28%	22.35%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.93%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ETTGX and FASGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1996	0.94

The correlation between ETTGX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETTGX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETTGX

ETTGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
ETTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ETTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ETTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ETTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
ETTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETTGX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETTGX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.61	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.64	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.49	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	3.39	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.48	14.98	-4.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETTGX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETTGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETTGX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETTGX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	2.61	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.69	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.79	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.63	-0.07

Drawdowns

ETTGX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETTGX drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETTGX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETTGX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.02%	-47.35%	-4.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.54%	-7.95%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.96%	-12.80%	-6.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.03%	-23.54%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.98%	-27.20%	-5.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	0.00%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-6.71%	-1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	1.79%	+0.53%

Volatility

ETTGX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) is 3.01%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that ETTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETTGX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	3.30%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.36%	8.39%	+0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	10.34%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.32%	12.27%	+5.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.34%	12.65%	+5.69%

ETTGX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETTGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETTGX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

ETTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund	2.74%	2.98%	2.11%	0.58%	0.64%	0.35%	0.62%	0.83%	0.93%	0.88%	1.06%	1.06%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETTGX and FASGX in my portfolio?

ETTGX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETTGX or FASGX?

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to ETTGX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETTGX dropped -52.02% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.