ETRL vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

ETRL vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 351.25% return.

ETRL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.92%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -2.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 5.14%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 351.25%
• 6M: 346.66%
• 1Y: 703.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETRL vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF	1.78%	-51.32%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	351.25%	46.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ETRL and AMDL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

ETRL vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETRL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETRL vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETRL	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	5.31	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.87	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.50	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	12.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	24.60	—

Drawdowns

ETRL vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETRL	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.63%	-88.63%	+12.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.45%	-8.87%	-41.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.88%	-47.61%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	28.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETRL	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	46.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	101.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.42%	133.92%	-31.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.42%	118.33%	-15.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.42%	118.33%	-15.91%

ETRL vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETRL vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETRL nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETRL and AMDL in my portfolio?

ETRL and AMDL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETRL or AMDL?

On fees, AMDL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETRL or AMDL?

AMDL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETRL or AMDL?

ETRL and AMDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETRL and AMDL?

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 1.15% for AMDL.