ETRL vs. BAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - ETRL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). ETRL is actively managed, while BAR is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.

Performance

ETRL vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETRL having a 3.01% return and BAR slightly lower at 2.94%.

ETRL

• 1D: -7.56%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 6M: -31.77%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAR

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 32.26%
• 3Y*: 31.38%
• 5Y*: 18.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETRL vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF	3.01%	-50.91%
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	2.94%	20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ETRL and BAR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

ETRL vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAR

BAR Risk / Return Rank: 32
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETRL vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETRL	BAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.57	0.90	-1.47

Drawdowns

ETRL vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.44%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and BAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETRL	BAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.44%	-21.53%	-54.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.43%	-17.72%	-31.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.50%	-6.45%	-41.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETRL	BAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	105.94%	26.43%	+79.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.94%	17.90%	+88.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	105.94%	16.38%	+89.56%

ETRL vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETRL vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETRL nor BAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETRL and BAR in my portfolio?

ETRL and BAR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETRL or BAR?

On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETRL or BAR?

BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETRL or BAR?

ETRL and BAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETRL and BAR?

ETRL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 0.17% for BAR.