ETN vs. CB
ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) and CB (Chubb Limited) are both stocks. ETN operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ETN returned 24.06%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for CB. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ETN vs. CB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETN achieves a 30.21% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ETN has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 24.06%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.46% annualized return.
ETN
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 30.21%
- 6M
- 30.21%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 28.70%
- 5Y*
- 24.15%
- 10Y*
- 24.06%
CB
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- 13.90%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 23.01%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
ETN vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 30.21% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
CB Chubb Limited | 13.38% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETN and CB is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993 | 0.36 |
The correlation between ETN and CB shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ETN:
$160.47B
CB:
$138.79B
ETN:
$10.24
CB:
$28.45
ETN:
40.25
CB:
12.36
ETN:
2.19
CB:
0.86
ETN:
5.63
CB:
2.91
ETN:
8.12
CB:
1.74
ETN:
$28.52B
CB:
$48.15B
ETN:
$7.87B
CB:
$17.01B
ETN:
$4.75B
CB:
$12.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETN vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank
ETN
CB
ETN vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETN | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 2.47 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 6.35 | -4.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETN vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETN drawdown since its inception was -68.95%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETN and CB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETN | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.95% | -50.99% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.14% | -9.36% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.46% | -14.35% | -20.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.46% | -19.26% | -15.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | -42.59% | -1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | 0.00% | -5.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -10.67% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 4.14% | +4.79% |
Volatility
ETN vs. CB - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a higher volatility of 16.89% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 6.76%. This indicates that ETN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETN | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.89% | 6.76% | +10.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.49% | 13.71% | +14.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.92% | 18.22% | +16.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 20.31% | +10.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.19% | 23.66% | +6.53% |
Dividends
ETN vs. CB - Dividend Comparison
ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than CB's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.04% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
Financials
ETN vs. CB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Corporation plc and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ETN and CB have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETN has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to CB (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETN dropped -68.95% vs CB's -50.99%.
CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETN and CB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer