PortfoliosLab logo
ETN vs. PH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ETN and PH is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ETN vs. PH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ETN:

-0.10

PH:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

ETN:

0.14

PH:

1.08

Omega Ratio

ETN:

1.02

PH:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

ETN:

-0.10

PH:

0.78

Martin Ratio

ETN:

-0.24

PH:

2.61

Ulcer Index

ETN:

14.30%

PH:

8.04%

Daily Std Dev

ETN:

38.44%

PH:

34.95%

Max Drawdown

ETN:

-68.95%

PH:

-66.92%

Current Drawdown

ETN:

-14.35%

PH:

-7.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ETN:

$125.63B

PH:

$83.69B

EPS

ETN:

$9.92

PH:

$26.00

PE Ratio

ETN:

32.36

PH:

25.19

PEG Ratio

ETN:

2.69

PH:

2.93

PS Ratio

ETN:

4.96

PH:

4.23

PB Ratio

ETN:

6.79

PH:

6.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

ETN:

$25.31B

PH:

$19.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ETN:

$9.73B

PH:

$7.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

ETN:

$5.80B

PH:

$5.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETN achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than PH's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ETN has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 19.27%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 20.24% annualized return.


ETN

YTD

-2.56%

1M

11.55%

6M

-14.16%

1Y

-4.56%

3Y*

36.03%

5Y*

34.97%

10Y*

19.27%

PH

YTD

3.51%

1M

9.83%

6M

-6.54%

1Y

24.90%

3Y*

37.57%

5Y*

33.32%

10Y*

20.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Eaton Corporation plc

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ETN vs. PH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETN is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETN is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETN is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETN is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETN is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETN is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PH is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PH is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PH is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PH is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PH is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PH is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ETN vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ETN Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the PH Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETN and PH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ETN vs. PH - Dividend Comparison

ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than PH's 1.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.23%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
1.02%1.00%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%1.61%

Drawdowns

ETN vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETN drawdown since its inception was -68.95%, roughly equal to the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETN and PH.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ETN vs. PH - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) have volatilities of 6.08% and 5.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ETN vs. PH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Corporation plc and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B6.00B6.50B20212022202320242025
6.38B
4.96B
(ETN) Total Revenue
(PH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ETN vs. PH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Eaton Corporation plc and Parker-Hannifin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
38.4%
36.9%
(ETN) Gross Margin
(PH) Gross Margin
ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 6.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

PH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.83B and revenue of 4.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

PH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.05B and revenue of 4.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 964.00M and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

PH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 960.87M and revenue of 4.96B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.