PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ETN vs. PH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ETNPH
YTD Return31.33%15.52%
1Y Return85.88%66.62%
3Y Return (Ann)32.24%21.32%
5Y Return (Ann)33.63%26.27%
10Y Return (Ann)19.11%17.73%
Sharpe Ratio3.412.68
Daily Std Dev25.22%24.47%
Max Drawdown-68.95%-66.92%
Current Drawdown-4.61%-6.35%

Fundamentals


ETNPH
Market Cap$129.68B$71.09B
EPS$8.01$20.26
PE Ratio40.4927.33
PEG Ratio3.262.26
Revenue (TTM)$23.20B$19.83B
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.89B$6.57B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.86B$4.96B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between ETN and PH is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ETN vs. PH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ETN achieves a 31.33% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 15.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ETN has outperformed PH with an annualized return of 19.11%, while PH has yielded a comparatively lower 17.73% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


12,000.00%14,000.00%16,000.00%18,000.00%20,000.00%22,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
20,991.12%
15,041.52%
ETN
PH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Eaton Corporation plc

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ETN vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ETN, currently valued at 3.41, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.003.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ETN, currently valued at 4.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ETN, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.57
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ETN, currently valued at 4.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ETN, currently valued at 16.07, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0016.07
PH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PH, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PH, currently valued at 3.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PH, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PH, currently valued at 4.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PH, currently valued at 16.17, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0016.17

ETN vs. PH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETN Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which roughly equals the PH Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ETN and PH.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.41
2.72
ETN
PH

Dividends

ETN vs. PH - Dividend Comparison

ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than PH's 1.12% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.41%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%2.21%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
1.12%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%1.61%1.38%

Drawdowns

ETN vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETN drawdown since its inception was -68.95%, roughly equal to the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETN and PH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-4.61%
-6.35%
ETN
PH

Volatility

ETN vs. PH - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 4.91%. This indicates that ETN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.98%
4.91%
ETN
PH

Financials

ETN vs. PH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Corporation plc and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items