ETHV vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. ETHV is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -44.82% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

ETHV vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -36.95% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -27.52% return.

ETHV

• 1D: -2.42%
• 1M: 4.38%
• 6M: -43.07%
• YTD: -36.95%
• 1Y: -44.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 38.88%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -27.52%
• 1Y: 299.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHV vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	-36.95%	-11.02%	41.75%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.52%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHV and MSTZ is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.68

The correlation between ETHV and MSTZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.78 (1 year) to -0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETHV vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHV

ETHV Risk / Return Rank: 4
ETHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ETHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ETHV Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ETHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ETHV Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHV vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHV	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	2.03	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	2.49	-3.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.33	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	3.55	-4.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	6.84	-7.87

ETHV vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHV Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHV and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHV vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHV	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.88%	-99.38%	+31.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.88%	-84.89%	+17.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.35%	-97.53%	+36.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-94.55%	+59.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.55%	43.95%	-0.40%

Volatility

ETHV vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) is 14.44%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that ETHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHV	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.44%	55.03%	-40.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.28%	134.45%	-87.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.36%	148.58%	-80.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.82%	170.73%	-98.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.82%	170.73%	-98.91%

ETHV vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHV vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHV nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHV and MSTZ in my portfolio?

ETHV and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHV or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to ETHV (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -67.88% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, ETHV or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs -44.82% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 14.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHV or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs -44.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHV or MSTZ?

ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHV or MSTZ?

ETHV and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETHV and MSTZ?

ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.