ETHT vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. ETHT is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHT returned -82.31% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. ETHT charges 0.94%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

ETHT vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -74.51% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

ETHT

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 11.36%
• 6M: -75.81%
• YTD: -74.51%
• 1Y: -82.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHT vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	-74.51%	-64.86%	74.62%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHT and MSTZ is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.68

The correlation between ETHT and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETHT vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHT

ETHT Risk / Return Rank: 4
ETHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ETHT Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ETHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ETHT Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHT vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHT	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	1.64	-2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.69	2.34	-3.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.30	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	2.86	-3.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	5.59	-6.75

ETHT vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHT and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHT vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHT	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.25%	-99.38%	+3.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.27%	-84.89%	-9.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.11%	-97.51%	+2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.33%	-94.53%	+26.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	68.76%	43.41%	+25.35%

Volatility

ETHT vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) is 31.86%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that ETHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHT	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.86%	56.46%	-24.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	95.10%	135.20%	-40.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	136.61%	148.41%	-11.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	142.37%	171.17%	-28.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	142.37%	171.17%	-28.80%

ETHT vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHT vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.78%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	18.78%	4.57%	0.02%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHT and MSTZ in my portfolio?

ETHT and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHT or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to ETHT (31.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHT dropped -96.25% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, ETHT or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs -82.31% for ETHT. On fees, ETHT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, ETHT has been the lower-risk option at 31.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHT or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs -82.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHT or MSTZ?

ETHT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHT or MSTZ?

ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 18.78%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between ETHT and MSTZ?

ETHT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.