ETHT vs. FETH
ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ETHT tracks the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%) while FETH tracks the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHT returned -82.70% vs -41.37% for FETH. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETHT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FETH.
Performance
ETHT vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -75.07% return, which is significantly lower than FETH's -40.36% return.
ETHT
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- 8.91%
- 6M
- -76.81%
- YTD
- -75.07%
- 1Y
- -82.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- 6M
- -42.88%
- YTD
- -40.36%
- 1Y
- -41.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHT vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | -75.07% | -64.86% | -31.53% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -40.36% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHT and FETH is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ETHT and FETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHT vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
ETHT
FETH
ETHT vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHT | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.93 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.61 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | -0.96 | -0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHT vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than FETH's maximum drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHT | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.25% | -67.94% | -28.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.27% | -67.94% | -26.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.22% | -63.51% | -31.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.38% | -34.52% | -33.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.01% | 43.12% | +25.89% |
Volatility
ETHT vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) has a higher volatility of 31.73% compared to Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) at 16.12%. This indicates that ETHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHT | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.73% | 16.12% | +15.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 95.10% | 46.94% | +48.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.16% | 68.30% | +67.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.24% | 71.86% | +70.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.24% | 71.86% | +70.38% |
ETHT vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHT vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.20%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | 19.20% | 4.57% | 0.02% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ETHT and FETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETHT has higher volatility (31.73%) compared to FETH (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHT dropped -96.25% vs FETH's -67.94%.
On 1-year performance, FETH leads with -41.37% vs -82.70% for ETHT. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FETH has been the lower-risk option at 16.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FETH has performed better with a -41.37% return vs -82.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ETHT.
ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 19.20%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
ETHT tracks Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 0.25% for FETH.
FETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHT and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer