ETHO vs. FFSM

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. ETHO is passively managed, while FFSM is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 37.96% vs 43.07% for FFSM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FFSM.

Performance

ETHO vs. FFSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly lower than FFSM's 24.27% return.

ETHO

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 3.50%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 17.91%
• 1Y: 37.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFSM

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 24.27%
• 6M: 21.19%
• 1Y: 43.07%
• 3Y*: 22.71%
• 5Y*: 11.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHO vs. FFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	20.60%	10.23%	11.21%
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	24.27%	14.89%	14.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and FFSM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.92

The correlation between ETHO and FFSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ETHO vs. FFSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ETHO	FFSM
Technology	28.7%	14.0%
Industrials	15.9%	29.5%
Healthcare	12.3%	9.1%
Financial Services	12.2%	22.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	12.2%
Real Estate	6.3%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	2.3%
Communication Services	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	6.2%
Utilities	2.5%	1.8%
Energy	0.3%	2.2%

Return for Risk

ETHO vs. FFSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 79
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FFSM

FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 84
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHO vs. FFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHO	FFSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.32	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	3.21	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.40	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	4.17	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.96	16.79	-0.83

ETHO vs. FFSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FFSM Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHO and FFSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. FFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSM drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and FFSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHO	FFSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.50%	-26.65%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.25%	-10.37%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-7.78%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.57%	-0.19%

Volatility

ETHO vs. FFSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 5.06%, while Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHO	FFSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.06%	6.31%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.21%	14.69%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.88%	18.64%	-0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.47%	20.77%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.47%	20.61%	-1.14%

ETHO vs. FFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSM's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHO vs. FFSM - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than FFSM's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.71%	0.86%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.43%	0.56%	0.62%	0.56%	0.58%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHO and FFSM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, ETHO and FFSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ETHO or FFSM?

FFSM has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to ETHO (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs FFSM's -26.65%.

Which ETF is better, ETHO or FFSM?

On 1-year performance, FFSM leads with 43.07% vs 37.96% for ETHO. On fees, FFSM is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHO or FFSM?

Over the 1-year period, FFSM has performed better with a 43.07% return vs 37.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHO or FFSM?

FFSM is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHO or FFSM?

ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

What is the main difference between ETHO and FFSM?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.43% for FFSM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.