ETHB vs. TLT
ETHB (iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ETHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
ETHB vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETHB
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -2.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.62M | $8.86M | $9.94M | |
| $2.33B | $2.02B | $2.19B |
ETHB vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | -9.16% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHB and TLT is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHB vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
ETHB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TLT
ETHB vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHB | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.99 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHB vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHB drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHB | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -48.35% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.07% | -42.36% | +19.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.76% | -13.99% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility
ETHB vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHB | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.40% | 9.32% | +43.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 15.74% | +36.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 14.83% | +37.57% |
ETHB vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHB vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
ETHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than TLT's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHB and TLT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHB.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.20% for ETHB.
ETHB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TLT is Government Bonds. ETHB tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHB and 0.15% for TLT.
Find the right allocation for ETHB and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer