ETHB vs. WGMI
ETHB (iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHB is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ETHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.
Performance
ETHB vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETHB
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
WGMI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 34.47%
- 1Y
- 119.73%
- 3Y*
- 49.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.62M | $8.86M | $9.94M | |
| $36.52M | $32.75M | $41.50M |
ETHB vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | -9.16% |
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF | 32.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHB and WGMI is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHB vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank
ETHB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WGMI
ETHB vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHB | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHB vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHB drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB and WGMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHB | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -85.76% | +49.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -50.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.07% | -28.63% | +5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.76% | -41.97% | +26.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.29% | — |
Volatility
ETHB vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHB | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 61.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.40% | 83.14% | -30.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 82.40% | -30.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 82.40% | -30.00% |
ETHB vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHB vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison
ETHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHB and WGMI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.
ETHB has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHB and 0.75% for WGMI.
Find the right allocation for ETHB and WGMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer