ETHA vs. TLT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT).
ETHA and TLT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate-New York Variant. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. TLT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2002. Both ETHA and TLT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ETHA vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETHA vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -29.42% | -11.31% | -3.62% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.17% | 4.25% | -3.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHA achieves a -29.42% return, which is significantly lower than TLT's 0.17% return.
ETHA
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- -29.42%
- 6M
- -49.76%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- -2.78%
- 5Y*
- -5.85%
- 10Y*
- -1.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETHA vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ETHA vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
ETHA
TLT
ETHA vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | -0.04 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | 0.02 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.00 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.05 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 0.11 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | -0.04 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.26 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHA and TLT is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ETHA vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
ETHA vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and TLT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -48.35% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.66% | -9.23% | -52.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.74% | -40.17% | -16.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.40% | -13.62% | -16.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.40% | 4.38% | +26.02% |
Volatility
ETHA vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 3.71%. This indicates that ETHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETHA | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 3.71% | +15.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.69% | 6.61% | +47.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.12% | 11.44% | +64.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.10% | 15.90% | +59.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.10% | 14.93% | +60.17% |