ETFT vs. POW
ETFT (Fundsmith Equity ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETFT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Fundsmith, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ETFT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
ETFT vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 31.51% return.
ETFT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
POW
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.74K | $25.41K | $19.24K | |
| $1.21M | $2.19M | $3.04M |
ETFT vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | -1.19% | 0.06% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 31.51% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFT and POW is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETFT vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETFT vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -28.02% | +13.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -22.73% | +18.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -5.52% | +0.78% |
Volatility
ETFT vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETFT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 34.38% | -19.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 34.38% | -19.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 34.38% | -19.56% |
ETFT vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETFT vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.15% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETFT and POW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETFT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETFT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.
ETFT is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for ETFT and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer