ETFT vs. VEGA
ETFT (Fundsmith Equity ETF) and VEGA (AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ETFT charges 0.60%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for VEGA.
Performance
ETFT vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than VEGA's 5.98% return.
ETFT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VEGA
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.74K | $25.41K | $19.24K | |
| $235.51K | $205.05K | $288.45K |
ETFT vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | -1.19% | 0.06% |
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | 5.98% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFT and VEGA is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETFT vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank
ETFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VEGA
ETFT vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETFT | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETFT vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum VEGA drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and VEGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFT | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -28.37% | +13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -1.56% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -3.76% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility
ETFT vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETFT | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 9.87% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 12.29% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 12.73% | +2.09% |
ETFT vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETFT vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison
ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | 1.27% | 1.34% | 1.05% | 1.12% | 1.89% | 0.55% | 0.28% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETFT and VEGA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETFT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETFT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.
VEGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.
They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 2.02% for VEGA.
Find the right allocation for ETFT and VEGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer