PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETFT vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETFT vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than BDVL's 3.52% return.


ETFT

1D
-1.86%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-1.97%
6M
-1.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
3.52%
6M
3.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETFT vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ETFT and BDVL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETFT vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ETFT vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETFTBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.81

-1.06

Drawdowns

ETFT vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETFTBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.77%

-7.71%

-7.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

-2.08%

-2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-1.19%

-3.60%

Volatility

ETFT vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETFTBDVLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

9.62%

+5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

9.62%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

9.62%

+5.97%

ETFT vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETFT vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ETFT and BDVL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ETFT.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.

They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETFT and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer