ETD vs. CINF
ETD (Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.) and CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) are both stocks. ETD operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ETD returned 2.18%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for CINF. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ETD vs. CINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETD achieves a -3.14% return, which is significantly lower than CINF's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ETD has underperformed CINF with an annualized return of 2.18%, while CINF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.
ETD
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 8.05%
- YTD
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- 1Y
- -16.13%
- 3Y*
- -1.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
CINF
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- 1Y
- 21.30%
- 3Y*
- 24.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
ETD vs. CINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETD Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. | -3.14% | -13.21% | -5.95% | 28.70% | 7.47% | 44.17% | 11.29% | 18.89% | -35.80% | -20.54% |
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 6.22% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -7.89% | 33.28% | -14.15% | 38.87% | 6.25% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETD and CINF is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1993 | 0.34 |
The correlation between ETD and CINF shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ETD:
$1.58
CINF:
$23.30
ETD:
13.53
CINF:
7.40
ETD:
3.80
CINF:
0.22
ETD:
0.92
CINF:
1.58
ETD:
$593.09M
CINF:
$12.92B
ETD:
$358.21M
CINF:
$5.39B
ETD:
$55.70M
CINF:
$3.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETD vs. CINF — Risk / Return Rank
ETD
CINF
ETD vs. CINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETD | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.19 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 2.04 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 5.31 | -6.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETD vs. CINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETD drawdown since its inception was -82.91%, which is greater than CINF's maximum drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETD and CINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETD | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.91% | -59.64% | -23.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.36% | -10.46% | -24.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.84% | -20.03% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.84% | -35.77% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.68% | -58.12% | -15.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.89% | 0.00% | -27.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.54% | -12.18% | -14.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.54% | 4.02% | +15.52% |
Volatility
ETD vs. CINF - Volatility Comparison
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) at 6.20%. This indicates that ETD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETD | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 6.20% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.33% | 13.78% | +5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.09% | 19.80% | +9.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.16% | 25.63% | +8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.26% | 28.82% | +8.44% |
Dividends
ETD vs. CINF - Dividend Comparison
ETD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than CINF's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.06% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
ETD Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. | 8.49% | 7.92% | 6.87% | 5.95% | 6.62% | 10.61% | 3.12% | 9.34% | 6.08% | 2.66% | 1.76% | 1.87% |
Financials
ETD vs. CINF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. and Cincinnati Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ETD vs. CINF - Profitability Comparison
ETD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.69M and revenue of 135.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
CINF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ETD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported an operating income of 6.47M and revenue of 135.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.
CINF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ETD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported a net income of 5.93M and revenue of 135.84M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
CINF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETD and CINF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETD has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to CINF (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETD dropped -82.91% vs CINF's -59.64%.
CINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETD and CINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer