PortfoliosLab logo
ETD vs. FLO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ETD and FLO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ETD vs. FLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ETD:

-0.14

FLO:

-1.33

Sortino Ratio

ETD:

0.16

FLO:

-1.79

Omega Ratio

ETD:

1.02

FLO:

0.79

Calmar Ratio

ETD:

-0.10

FLO:

-0.72

Martin Ratio

ETD:

-0.25

FLO:

-1.62

Ulcer Index

ETD:

9.29%

FLO:

16.52%

Daily Std Dev

ETD:

35.19%

FLO:

20.90%

Max Drawdown

ETD:

-82.91%

FLO:

-83.49%

Current Drawdown

ETD:

-15.06%

FLO:

-35.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ETD:

$663.21M

FLO:

$3.72B

EPS

ETD:

$2.25

FLO:

$1.17

PE Ratio

ETD:

11.59

FLO:

15.04

PS Ratio

ETD:

1.06

FLO:

0.73

PB Ratio

ETD:

1.34

FLO:

2.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

ETD:

$622.92M

FLO:

$3.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ETD:

$378.44M

FLO:

$1.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

ETD:

$84.77M

FLO:

$369.82M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETD achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly higher than FLO's -13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ETD has outperformed FLO with an annualized return of 6.53%, while FLO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.82% annualized return.


ETD

YTD

-1.01%

1M

2.35%

6M

-4.45%

1Y

-4.87%

5Y*

31.87%

10Y*

6.53%

FLO

YTD

-13.71%

1M

-4.76%

6M

-16.43%

1Y

-27.65%

5Y*

-1.31%

10Y*

0.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ETD vs. FLO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETD is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETD is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETD is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETD is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETD is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETD is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FLO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLO is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLO is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLO is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLO is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLO is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLO is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ETD vs. FLO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ETD Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the FLO Sharpe Ratio of -1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETD and FLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ETD vs. FLO - Dividend Comparison

ETD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than FLO's 5.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ETD
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
5.72%6.87%5.95%6.62%10.61%3.12%9.34%6.08%2.66%1.76%1.87%1.36%
FLO
Flowers Foods, Inc.
5.45%4.60%4.04%3.10%3.02%3.49%3.45%3.84%3.47%3.13%2.64%2.53%

Drawdowns

ETD vs. FLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETD drawdown since its inception was -82.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FLO drawdown of -83.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETD and FLO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ETD vs. FLO - Volatility Comparison

Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) has a higher volatility of 16.14% compared to Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) at 6.32%. This indicates that ETD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ETD vs. FLO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. and Flowers Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
142.70M
1.11B
(ETD) Total Revenue
(FLO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ETD vs. FLO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. and Flowers Foods, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
61.2%
48.8%
(ETD) Gross Margin
(FLO) Gross Margin
ETD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.36M and revenue of 142.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

FLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 542.66M and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.

ETD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported an operating income of 11.00M and revenue of 142.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

FLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.35M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

ETD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported a net income of 9.61M and revenue of 142.70M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

FLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a net income of 43.12M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.