ETD vs. SSB
ETD (Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.) and SSB (SouthState Corporation) are both stocks. ETD operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while SSB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ETD returned 1.81%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for SSB. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ETD vs. SSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETD achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than SSB's 13.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ETD has underperformed SSB with an annualized return of 1.81%, while SSB has yielded a comparatively higher 6.29% annualized return.
ETD
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.76%
SSB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 16.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.13M | $9.80M | $12.37M | |
| $93.61M | $88.35M | $79.31M |
ETD vs. SSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETD Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. | 1.72% | -13.21% | -5.95% | 28.70% | 7.47% | 44.17% | 11.29% | 18.89% | -35.80% | -20.54% |
SSB SouthState Corporation | 13.00% | -3.05% | 20.66% | 13.79% | -2.39% | 13.51% | -14.13% | 47.99% | -30.04% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETD and SSB is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1997 | 0.36 |
The correlation between ETD and SSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ETD:
$570.00M
SSB:
$10.19B
ETD:
$1.56
SSB:
$9.51
ETD:
14.37
SSB:
11.05
ETD:
0.99
SSB:
2.92
ETD:
1.21
SSB:
1.13
ETD:
$579.49M
SSB:
$3.59B
ETD:
$354.60M
SSB:
$1.38B
ETD:
$61.23M
SSB:
$1.55B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETD vs. SSB — Risk / Return Rank
ETD
SSB
ETD vs. SSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) and SouthState Corporation (SSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETD | SSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.12 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.81 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 1.60 | -2.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETD vs. SSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETD drawdown since its inception was -82.91%, which is greater than SSB's maximum drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETD and SSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETD | SSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.91% | -58.21% | -24.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.36% | -17.84% | -17.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.84% | -27.64% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.84% | -32.70% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.68% | -51.57% | -22.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.27% | -2.64% | -21.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.53% | -15.33% | -11.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.93% | 9.04% | +11.89% |
Volatility
ETD vs. SSB - Volatility Comparison
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to SouthState Corporation (SSB) at 7.03%. This indicates that ETD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETD | SSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 7.03% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 17.38% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.25% | 24.49% | +4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.04% | 31.24% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 34.41% | +2.86% |
Dividends
ETD vs. SSB - Dividend Comparison
ETD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, more than SSB's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETD Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. | 8.08% | 7.92% | 6.87% | 5.95% | 6.62% | 10.61% | 3.12% | 9.34% | 6.08% | 2.66% | 1.76% | 1.87% |
SSB SouthState Corporation | 2.28% | 2.42% | 2.13% | 2.42% | 2.59% | 2.40% | 2.60% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 1.51% | 1.38% | 1.36% |
Financials
ETD vs. SSB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. and SouthState Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ETD vs. SSB - Profitability Comparison
ETD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported a gross profit of 92.62M and revenue of 146.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.1%.
SSB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SouthState Corporation reported a gross profit of -650.90M and revenue of 738.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -88.2%.
ETD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported an operating income of 14.24M and revenue of 146.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.
SSB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SouthState Corporation reported an operating income of -94.55M and revenue of 738.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.8%.
ETD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported a net income of 11.75M and revenue of 146.75M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
SSB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SouthState Corporation reported a net income of 230.02M and revenue of 738.16M, resulting in a net margin of 31.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETD and SSB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETD has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to SSB (7.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETD dropped -82.91% vs SSB's -58.21%.
SSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETD and SSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer