PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CINF vs. MKL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CINFMKL
YTD Return13.80%11.35%
1Y Return15.69%18.30%
3Y Return (Ann)2.76%10.20%
5Y Return (Ann)6.76%8.30%
10Y Return (Ann)12.43%9.47%
Sharpe Ratio0.700.79
Daily Std Dev21.62%22.37%
Max Drawdown-59.69%-61.32%
Current Drawdown-12.54%0.00%

Fundamentals


CINFMKL
Market Cap$17.37B$18.73B
EPS$15.02$146.96
PE Ratio7.389.77
PEG Ratio-158.724.14
Revenue (TTM)$10.71B$15.80B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$533.00M$4.71B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.12B$3.19B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CINF and MKL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CINF vs. MKL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly higher than MKL's 11.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed MKL with an annualized return of 12.43%, while MKL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%14,000.00%16,000.00%18,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6,245.09%
18,754.91%
CINF
MKL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cincinnati Financial Corporation

Markel Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CINF vs. MKL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Markel Corporation (MKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CINF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CINF, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CINF, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CINF, currently valued at 3.02, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.02
MKL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MKL, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MKL, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MKL, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MKL, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MKL, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.21

CINF vs. MKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which roughly equals the MKL Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CINF and MKL.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.70
0.79
CINF
MKL

Dividends

CINF vs. MKL - Dividend Comparison

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while MKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
2.62%2.90%2.70%2.21%2.75%2.13%2.74%3.32%2.52%3.84%3.35%3.12%
MKL
Markel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CINF vs. MKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.69%, roughly equal to the maximum MKL drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and MKL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-12.54%
0
CINF
MKL

Volatility

CINF vs. MKL - Volatility Comparison

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Markel Corporation (MKL) at 8.25%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.03%
8.25%
CINF
MKL

Financials

CINF vs. MKL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Markel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items