PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CINF vs. MKL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CINF and MKL is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CINF vs. MKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Markel Corporation (MKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%8,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5,926.26%
7,841.15%
CINF
MKL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CINF:

2.16

MKL:

1.25

Sortino Ratio

CINF:

2.79

MKL:

1.77

Omega Ratio

CINF:

1.39

MKL:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

CINF:

1.93

MKL:

2.43

Martin Ratio

CINF:

12.89

MKL:

5.62

Ulcer Index

CINF:

3.64%

MKL:

4.39%

Daily Std Dev

CINF:

21.74%

MKL:

19.78%

Max Drawdown

CINF:

-59.64%

MKL:

-61.32%

Current Drawdown

CINF:

-9.22%

MKL:

-3.24%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CINF:

$23.10B

MKL:

$22.00B

EPS

CINF:

$19.47

MKL:

$216.77

PE Ratio

CINF:

7.59

MKL:

7.89

PEG Ratio

CINF:

-158.72

MKL:

7.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

CINF:

$12.16B

MKL:

$17.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CINF:

$12.16B

MKL:

$17.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

CINF:

$3.01B

MKL:

$4.30B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a 43.35% return, which is significantly higher than MKL's 21.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed MKL with an annualized return of 13.93%, while MKL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.


CINF

YTD

43.35%

1M

-4.11%

6M

26.95%

1Y

45.61%

5Y*

9.69%

10Y*

13.93%

MKL

YTD

21.64%

1M

1.95%

6M

9.81%

1Y

24.49%

5Y*

8.71%

10Y*

9.70%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CINF vs. MKL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Markel Corporation (MKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CINF, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.161.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for CINF, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.791.77
The chart of Omega ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.391.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.932.43
The chart of Martin ratio for CINF, currently valued at 12.89, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0012.895.62
CINF
MKL

The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the MKL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINF and MKL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.16
1.25
CINF
MKL

Dividends

CINF vs. MKL - Dividend Comparison

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, while MKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
2.24%2.90%2.70%2.21%2.75%2.13%2.74%3.33%2.53%3.89%3.40%3.16%
MKL
Markel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CINF vs. MKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, roughly equal to the maximum MKL drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and MKL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-9.22%
-3.24%
CINF
MKL

Volatility

CINF vs. MKL - Volatility Comparison

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Markel Corporation (MKL) at 4.51%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.84%
4.51%
CINF
MKL

Financials

CINF vs. MKL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Markel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab