CINF vs. JRS
CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) and JRS (Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CINF in Insurance - Property & Casualty, JRS in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, CINF returned 11.49%/yr vs 5.48%/yr for JRS. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CINF vs. JRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than JRS's 8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed JRS with an annualized return of 11.49%, while JRS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.48% annualized return.
CINF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
JRS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 11.76%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
CINF vs. JRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | -2.68% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -7.89% | 33.28% | -14.15% | 38.87% | 6.25% | 2.34% |
JRS Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund | 8.38% | -3.38% | 19.74% | 13.42% | -35.61% | 62.86% | -12.66% | 34.92% | -18.07% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF and JRS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2001 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
CINF:
$23.30
JRS:
$0.73
CINF:
6.78
JRS:
11.18
CINF:
0.20
JRS:
0.33
CINF:
1.45
JRS:
6.00
CINF:
$12.92B
JRS:
$39.07M
CINF:
$5.39B
JRS:
$34.33M
CINF:
$3.27B
JRS:
$39.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINF vs. JRS — Risk / Return Rank
CINF
JRS
CINF vs. JRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CINF | JRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 1.06 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 3.44 | -1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CINF | JRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.84 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.10 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.23 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.23 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
CINF vs. JRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum JRS drawdown of -87.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and JRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINF | JRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -87.80% | +28.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -11.10% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -25.33% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.77% | -45.57% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.12% | -54.64% | -3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.94% | -8.42% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -19.07% | +6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 3.42% | +0.63% |
Volatility
CINF vs. JRS - Volatility Comparison
Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS) at 4.08%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINF | JRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 4.08% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.21% | 10.83% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 14.13% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 21.89% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 24.30% | +4.49% |
Dividends
CINF vs. JRS - Dividend Comparison
CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than JRS's 8.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.25% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
JRS Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund | 8.37% | 8.88% | 7.88% | 8.70% | 11.06% | 5.93% | 9.00% | 7.16% | 9.99% | 8.88% | 9.10% | 9.04% |
Financials
CINF vs. JRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CINF vs. JRS - Profitability Comparison
CINF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
JRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund reported a gross profit of 9.59M and revenue of 11.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.1%.
CINF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
JRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund reported an operating income of 8.66M and revenue of 11.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.7%.
CINF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
JRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund reported a net income of 6.14M and revenue of 11.14M, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CINF and JRS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CINF has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to JRS (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINF dropped -59.64% vs JRS's -87.80%.
JRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CINF and JRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer