CINF vs. JRS

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than JRS's -5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed JRS with an annualized return of 14.66%, while JRS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.23% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the JRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINF and JRS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than JRS's 8.48% yield.

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum JRS drawdown of -87.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and JRS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS) at 5.74%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.