ETCO vs. BTCZ
ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. ETCO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
ETCO vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETCO achieves a -34.48% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 39.90% return.
ETCO
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -22.34%
- YTD
- -34.48%
- 6M
- -36.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.56%
- 1M
- 60.49%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 53.41%
- 1Y
- 60.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCO vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | -34.48% | -24.78% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 39.90% | 34.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCO and BTCZ is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025 | -0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCO vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
ETCO
BTCZ
ETCO vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETCO | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.17 | -0.55 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
ETCO vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCO | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.81% | -91.06% | +34.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.08% | -77.44% | +22.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.54% | -73.73% | +39.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.76% | — |
Volatility
ETCO vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCO | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 67.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.38% | 87.54% | -35.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.38% | 97.10% | -44.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.38% | 97.10% | -44.72% |
ETCO vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCO vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 129.56%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | 129.56% | 42.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCO and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETCO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETCO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 129.56%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 0.95% for BTCZ.
Find the right allocation for ETCO and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer