ETCG vs. USO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ETCG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Ethereum Classic (ETC), while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETCG returned -31.44%/yr vs 16.82%/yr for USO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.

Performance

ETCG vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -38.17% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 58.05% return.

ETCG

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -7.82%
• YTD: -38.17%
• 6M: -41.55%
• 1Y: -50.68%
• 3Y*: -15.22%
• 5Y*: -31.44%
• 10Y*: —

USO

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: -20.21%
• YTD: 58.05%
• 6M: 55.71%
• 1Y: 49.11%
• 3Y*: 20.34%
• 5Y*: 16.82%
• 10Y*: 2.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETCG vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	-38.17%	-39.78%	-9.57%	289.22%	-80.45%	145.11%	-10.70%	7.52%	-74.91%
USO United States Oil Fund LP	58.05%	-8.46%	13.35%	-4.94%	28.97%	64.68%	-67.79%	32.61%	-32.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCG and USO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018	0.06

The correlation between ETCG and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETCG vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETCG

ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 3
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4

USO

USO Risk / Return Rank: 36
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 37
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETCG vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETCG	USO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.82	1.13	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.28	1.77	-3.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.22	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	1.62	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	4.76	-5.85

ETCG vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETCG Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETCG and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETCG vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, roughly equal to the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and USO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETCG	USO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.59%	-98.19%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.71%	-30.51%	-38.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.59%	-30.51%	-49.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.70%	-36.23%	-56.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-86.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.53%	-88.37%	-7.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.72%	-75.32%	-7.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.42%	10.34%	+36.08%

Volatility

ETCG vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) is 11.97%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that ETCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETCG	USO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.97%	12.83%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.55%	39.67%	-3.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.06%	43.65%	+18.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.30%	36.40%	+56.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.95%	39.04%	+75.91%

ETCG vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETCG vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETCG nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETCG and USO in my portfolio?

ETCG and USO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETCG or USO?

USO has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to ETCG (11.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs USO's -98.19%.

Which ETF is better, ETCG or USO?

On 5-year performance, USO leads with 16.82% vs -31.44% for ETCG. On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, ETCG has been the lower-risk option at 11.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETCG or USO?

Over the 5-year period, USO has performed better with a 16.82% return vs -31.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETCG or USO?

USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETCG or USO?

ETCG and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETCG and USO?

ETCG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while USO is Oil & Gas. ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC), while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and USCF. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.86% for USO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.